What it means: How well you understood and completely fulfilled the requirements of the prompt.
For Task 1, this evaluates your ability to report on visual information, identify key trends, and provide a clear overview. For Task 2, it evaluates your ability to present a clear position, respond to all parts of the prompt, and develop your ideas with relevant support:
| Band | Task Achievement (Task 1) | Task Response (Task 2) |
|---|
| 8 | Sufficiently covers all requirements; key features are well described; clear overview presented with logical detail | Fully addresses all parts of the prompt; presents a well-developed position with relevant, extended, and supported ideas |
| 7 | Covers all requirements; some key features may be missed or overemphasized; presents a clear overview with logical comparison | Addresses all parts of the task; position is clearly presented throughout; presents relevant main ideas, though some may be underdeveloped |
| 6 | Covers the requirements; may miss or inaccurately report some key features; overview may be unclear or lack detailed context | Addresses the task; position is presented, though ideas may be repetitive or lack details; relevant main ideas are present but underdeveloped |
| 5 | Handles task inadequately; format may be inappropriate; key features unclear, missing, or inaccurate; no clear overview is present | Addresses the task only partially; position is unclear or inconsistent; main ideas are limited, underdeveloped, or unsupported |
💡 Expert Tip: For Task 1, always include an objective summary paragraph (the “Overview”). For Task 2, make sure you answer all questions asked in the prompt, or your Task Response score will be capped at a Band 5.